dc.contributor.author |
Markovska, O.Y. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-04-16T12:44:53Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-04-16T12:44:53Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Markovska O. Y. Рrotection of winter wheat from harmful organisms in crop rotation on irrigation of the south of Ukraine / O. Y. Markovska // Перспективні напрями та інноваційні досягнення аграрної науки: матеріали Всеукраїнської науково-практичної інтернет-конференції, присвяченої 145-річчю від заснування кафедри ботаніки та захисту рослин, 24 травня 2019 р. - Херсон: ДВНЗ «ХДАУ», 2019. – С. 32–35. |
ru |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2463 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The use of chemical and biological protection had a varying effect on seed yield of the test crop. Here, we got an average of 3.27 t / ha of winter wheat seeds by factor B under traditional fungicidal protection.
The application of Gaupsin allowed increasing this indicator by 6.7%, while the combined use of biopreparations Trichodermin and Gaupsin helped to form the maximum seed yield of (3.65 t/ha), which is 6.7-11.6% more than in other variants studied.
The application of microelements resulted in an increase in seed productivity of the studied crop from 3.08 t/ha in the control to 3.35-3.82 t/ha on the plots treated with Riverm, Nanovit Micro and Avatar. So, the use of these preparations contributed to a significant increase in seed yield - by 8.7-24.1%. Avatar had an advantage over other micronutrients under study: it allowed obtaining 7.3-14.2% more seeds than under the application of Riverm and Nanovit Micro.
Calculations testify that microfertilizers (factor C) had the greatest impact on the seed yield of the investigated crop (58.2%). Varietal composition (factor A) was the second (20.0%).
Chemical and biological means of plant protection (factor B) also significantly influenced the productivity of plants (16.1%). The interaction of the factors was low, which could be explained by different reactions of plants to the investigated plant protection agents and microfertilizers; the residual effect of unrecognized factors, mainly weather conditions and differences in cultivation technology elements, was 3.6%. |
ru |
dc.language.iso |
en |
ru |
dc.publisher |
ДВНЗ «Херсонський державний аграрний університет» |
ru |
dc.subject |
захист рослин |
ru |
dc.subject |
пшениця озима |
ru |
dc.subject |
шкідливі організми |
ru |
dc.subject |
зрошення |
ru |
dc.subject |
plant protection |
ru |
dc.subject |
winter wheat |
ru |
dc.subject |
harmful organisms |
ru |
dc.subject |
Кафедра ботаніки та захисту рослин |
ru |
dc.title |
Рrotection of winter wheat from harmful organisms in crop rotation on irrigation of the south of Ukraine. |
ru |
dc.type |
Article |
ru |